From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Venki <Venki(at)insoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Disappearing Records |
Date: | 2005-11-02 11:47:52 |
Message-ID: | 20051102114750.GC19550@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:00:35PM +0530, Venki wrote:
> >The really nasty thing about it is that because the records are now
> >considered really old, as soon as you do run VACUUM it'll start
> >removing the rows you want to save...
> So does this mean that when we do a vacuum for the first time there will
> still be data loss or Am I wrong in this?
VACUUM cannot recover data from transaction wraparound. But we havn't
even determined if this has happened as you have not yet posted the
output of this query:
SELECT datname, age(datfrozenxid) FROM pg_database;
Have a ncie day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Carlos Benkendorf | 2005-11-02 12:06:36 | Replicating databases |
Previous Message | Venki | 2005-11-02 11:30:35 | Re: Disappearing Records |