From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", |
Date: | 2005-10-28 20:47:09 |
Message-ID: | 20051028204708.GA29523@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Here's another core... (pid 805 for reference)
All of them have in common that the slotno being passed ($3 below) is in
SLRU_PAGE_READ_IN_PROGRESS state ... could it be a problem with lock
reordering? Maybe somebody is trying to read in a page, and somebody
else steals the buffer from under them. Not sure how likely is that.
BTW what's the relationship with the other assertion failure (the one in
the subject)?
> #3 0x000000000047365f in SimpleLruReadPage (ctl=0x7d9f40, pageno=169039, xid=0) at slru.c:307
> 307 Assert(shared->page_number[slotno] == pageno &&
>
> $1 = {ControlLock = SubtransControlLock, page_buffer = {0x2a98298380 "", 0x2a9829a380 "",
> 0x2a9829c380 "", 0x2a9829e380 "", 0x2a982a0380 "", 0x2a982a2380 "", 0x2a982a4380 "",
> 0x2a982a6380 ""}, page_status = {SLRU_PAGE_DIRTY, SLRU_PAGE_CLEAN,
> SLRU_PAGE_READ_IN_PROGRESS, SLRU_PAGE_CLEAN, SLRU_PAGE_CLEAN, SLRU_PAGE_READ_IN_PROGRESS,
> SLRU_PAGE_CLEAN, SLRU_PAGE_CLEAN}, page_number = {169452, 169351, 169163, 169238, 169236,
> 169328, 169233, 169239}, page_lru_count = {17108, 4, 1, 3, 5, 0, 6, 2}, buffer_locks = {
> 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31}, latest_page_number = 169452}
> $2 = 169039
> $3 = 2
> $4 = 1 '\001'
> $5 = 0
--
Alvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile ICBM: S 39º 49' 17.7", W 73º 14' 26.8"
"Nadie esta tan esclavizado como el que se cree libre no siendolo" (Goethe)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-28 20:58:56 | Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2005-10-28 20:36:26 | Re: enums |