From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)", File: "nbtsearch.c", Line: 89) |
Date: | 2005-10-26 21:14:17 |
Message-ID: | 20051026211411.GA773@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 04:03:41PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Is this something that should be logged better than it is? Is there any
> value in trying to save the index/table that's busted?
Unfortuatly, it's one of those Assert(expr) lines, they don't generally
give the opportunity for extra debug data. They're usually not even
compiled in...
> Yeah, looks like no core files yet (they would be in $PGDATA somewhere,
> correct?), so I had them hack their startup script to include ulimit -c
> unlimited. Luckily this is pretty reproducable, so hopefully we'll have
> a core soon.
Well, you know the query that generates it? EXPLAIN should tell you the
indexes it's using, so you could just REINDEX those...
Or REINDEX them all... :)
Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-26 21:38:22 | Re: sort_mem statistics ... |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-26 21:06:35 | Re: slower merge join on sorted data chosen over |