Re: Displaying current query - eliminating <IDLE>

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Rieback Melanie <melanie(at)cs(dot)vu(dot)nl>
Cc: Brad <postgresql(dot)org(at)likethesky(dot)com>, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Displaying current query - eliminating <IDLE>
Date: 2005-10-25 01:26:48
Message-ID: 20051025012648.GA32544@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:31:00PM +0200, Rieback Melanie wrote:
> > I would imagine there'd be a fairly simple tweak that could be done to
> > the source, assuming Melanie wants to build the database (and doesn't
> > mind forking off from future versions
>
> I wasn't planning on forking off new builds of Postgres. I am actually
> searching for a solution that works with existing databases.

Could you tell us what problem you're trying to solve? You've
said what you're trying to do but not why -- all we've seen so
far is:

> I warned you that my request is a strange one, but this is more of
> a puzzle, that happens to have a real use for me. It also doesn't
> have to be 100% repeatable. 50% or even 25% repeatable would be
> good enough for me, as long as it works a significant percentage
> of the time.

What are you trying to do that has a real use but that can be
unreliable most of the time?

--
Michael Fuhr

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-10-25 03:25:22 Re: bit map indexes in postgres
Previous Message phil campaigne 2005-10-24 22:12:22 Installation problem