| From: | CSN <cool_screen_name90001(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump with low priority? |
| Date: | 2005-10-24 19:18:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20051024191806.91378.qmail@web52910.mail.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
nice comes to mind:
nice pg_dump ...
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 07:39, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
> We have a huge database which must be backed up
every day with
> pg_dump. The problem is, it takes around half an
hour to produce the
> dump file, and all other processes on the same box
are starved for
> cycles (presumably due to I/O) during the dump. It's
not just an
> inconvenience, it's now evolved into a serious
problem that needs to
> be addressed.
>
> Is there any mechanism for running pg_dump with a
lower priority? I
> don't mind if the backup takes two hours instead of
half an hour, as
> long as other processes were getting their fair
share of cycles.
__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aaron Glenn | 2005-10-24 19:30:50 | Re: pg_dump with low priority? |
| Previous Message | Arthur Hoogervorst | 2005-10-24 19:15:15 | Re: Map of Postgresql Users (OT) |