| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL |
| Date: | 2005-10-18 18:55:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20051018185529.GJ3441@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 12:11:59PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Can we get any of that on the website somewhere?
Afilias has been a pretty open user (and we're not in the league of
some of those users, I understand). I have an unpleasant feeling
that I've contributed to the hold up of our case study's posting; but
in the meantime, if people want to use it, here's an old link with
the arguments we used to make PostgreSQL palatable to the ICANN
community. "What's a PostgreSQL" is not a question we hear much any
more, but in 2002 it was still a big problem:
http://icann.org/tlds/org/questions-to-applicants-13.htm
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
--Dennis Ritchie
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Travers | 2005-10-18 19:15:33 | Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-10-18 16:24:40 | Re: Is Postgres comparable to MSSQL |