From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Solving OID wrap-around in 7.4 DB? |
Date: | 2005-10-18 16:13:51 |
Message-ID: | 20051018161351.GG3441@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:28:00AM -0400, Jeff Boes wrote:
> On behalf of a previous employer who, due to major downsizing, is left
> without an answer to this:
>
> What's the best way to treat impending OID wrap-around in a 7.4.8
> database? This DB has been online for about 18 months, and is expected
> to hit the dreaded wrap-around in about a month. At an application
How many OIDs have been recovered? If the answer is "none" (i.e. the
database doesn't have many deletes), then there isn't likely much you
can do about it -- reloading the database is going to cause the same
problem.
As Chris says in another message, you can use Slony to replicate the
database, in order not to have a long outage. Note, too, that since
you say most tables don't actually use this pg_oid_status method, you
can get away with creating most of the tables without OIDs, which
will stave off your problem for a while. That'd probably even help
if the database mostly just grows, depending (of course) on where the
growth is.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
Information security isn't a technological problem. It's an economics
problem.
--Bruce Schneier
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomeh, Husam | 2005-10-18 20:24:11 | Re: scripts and ~/.psqlrc |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-18 15:17:40 | Re: postmaster blues after system restart |