| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| Date: | 2005-10-18 15:04:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20051018150457.GC3441@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 04:35:23PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> That was my point. FirebirdSQL already provides the SQL language, so
> what does MySQL offer that FirebirdSQL doesn't?
Why, compatibility with MySQL's dialect of SQL, of course. Who else
can accept '2005-02-30' as a date? ;-)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2005-10-18 15:07:52 | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2005-10-18 14:15:40 | Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2005-10-18 15:07:52 | Re: Oracle buys Innobase |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2005-10-18 14:59:59 | Re: On "multi-master" |