From: | Robert Creager <Robert(dot)Creager(at)Sun(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PGHackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Seeing context switch storm with 10/13 snapshot of |
Date: | 2005-10-18 16:29:43 |
Message-ID: | 20051018102943.00001b8a@C118181.stortek.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:25:25 +0100
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Please try this patch and see if it reduces the CS storm:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-10/msg00091.php
Yes, I will. I'd been trying to figure out what triggered it, as I was unable
to reproduce it for a while, but it gets there eventually. I had just
re-started with auto vacuum off, as that might be the trigger? I'll apply the
patch, re-build and re-start with auto vacuum back on, they way I'm running when
I know I'll see it.
>
> Do you have access to another similar machine to do comparative testing?
> Do you have access to another machine with different CPU arch? It would
> be good to firmly isolate this to a CPU architecture interaction issue.
I do have access to a windows version of the DL-380 but it's only a single CPU.
I've a dual AMD server at home, but I cannot run against the db there (reverse
VPN?). I'd need that reproducibility Tom wanted that I have not gotten to yet.
>
> Are the Xeons particularly old models? How new is the server?
It is a HP Proliant (post Compaq merger) DL-380. A couple years old.
Thanks,
Rob
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Creager | 2005-10-18 18:24:03 | Re: Seeing context switch storm with 10/13 snapshot of |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-10-18 14:52:11 | Call for translators |