From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Jonathan Beit-Aharon <jbeitaharon(at)intrusic(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about |
Date: | 2005-10-17 12:36:00 |
Message-ID: | 200510171236.j9HCa0L00844@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I think it would be shorter and clearer to write
> >
> > remoteConn *remconn = NULL;
> > ...
> > remconn = rconn;
> > ...
> > remconn->newXactForCursor = TRUE;
> >
> > Also, you might be able to combine this variable with the existing
> > rconn local variable and thus simplify the code even more.
>
> Thanks for the review Tom -- as usual, great suggestions. The attached
> (simpler) patch makes use of your advice. If there are no objections,
> I'll apply this tomorrow evening.
Looks good. Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-10-17 13:18:40 | Re: Can I use variable to store sql data - II |
Previous Message | NosyMan | 2005-10-17 06:59:49 | Can I use variable to store sql data - II |