| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Volkan YAZICI <volkan(dot)yazici(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented? |
| Date: | 2005-10-16 18:21:31 |
| Message-ID: | 200510161821.j9GILVO29383@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Really? Do we intend applications to call it?
>
> > Uh, well, we never call it ourselves, so if we don't expect other
> > applications to call it, why is it there?
>
> If it's intended for apps to call, how was the patch initially accepted
> with no documentation?
Not sure. That's why its history needs to be researched.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Volkan YAZICI | 2005-10-16 19:30:29 | Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-16 17:52:29 | Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-16 18:26:05 | Re: small typo |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-16 18:07:21 | Re: small typo |