Re: On "multi-master"

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On "multi-master"
Date: 2005-10-14 15:48:39
Message-ID: 20051014154839.GB19681@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 11:54:19PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Enforcement? There would be plenty of ways to achieve that. For
> example, you could set pg_hba.conf so that on ly the host where pgpool
> is running on could connect to the host where postmaster is running
> on.

That just changes the problem to someone logging in from that host.
(This isn't a theoretical problem, by the way; it's an objection that
I've heard from people.)

> Right. It's your freedom that you do not use pgpool until you think
> it's solid enough.

And my managers approve it :) I should note, for the record, that
I'm extremely impressed with pgpool. I just think we have some room
to grow before we can say we have something to really compete with
the commercial multimaster systems.

a

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
--Roger Brinner

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-10-14 15:52:39 PostgreSQL source inspection :)
Previous Message Dan Armbrust 2005-10-14 15:24:55 Re: fine tuned database dump/reload?