Re: Request for a "force interactive mode" flag (-I) for psql

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>
Cc: Bill Bartlett <bbartlett(at)meridianemr(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Request for a "force interactive mode" flag (-I) for psql
Date: 2005-10-14 14:05:05
Message-ID: 200510141405.j9EE55t19737@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

John DeSoi wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2005, at 4:42 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I haven't seen any replies to this, so I guess you are left with
> > either
> > hacking psql yourself or getting Cygwin folks to fix it. Sorry.
>
> I have asked for this also. It would make it much easier to control
> psql from other applications.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-04/threads.php
>
> It seems pretty simple and non-invasive. I don't recall seeing the
> reasons against doing it.

We need a large number of users who need something before we add it. If
we didn't we would have a mess of options.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher A. Watford 2005-10-14 14:57:39 Re: pg_config --pgxs on Win32
Previous Message John DeSoi 2005-10-14 13:56:35 Re: Request for a "force interactive mode" flag (-I) for psql