| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: On "multi-master" |
| Date: | 2005-10-13 18:46:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20051013184634.GR16317@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 02:30:11PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> This particular issue is fixable as of 8.1: pgpool should be using
> 2-phase commit.
Sure, but if we're talking about what people can put in production
today, I don't think 8.1 + pgpool with 2-phase commit is on the list.
(We got started down this road, I think, because someone was wanting
a multi-master system right away.) But I think it will be soon.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are
against all taxes for raising money to pay it off.
--Alexander Hamilton
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Turner | 2005-10-13 18:58:27 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0? |
| Previous Message | Marc Munro | 2005-10-13 18:41:42 | Re: Setting up a fine-grained permission system |