From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Path to enable a module to change the stack_base_ptr |
Date: | 2005-10-13 17:47:59 |
Message-ID: | 200510131747.j9DHlxJ16581@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> I'm not really in favor of this ... I think you are trying to make the
> >>> backend do something that will never work reliably.
>
> > Do we want to make this change for 8.1?
>
> I don't want to do it at all. The justification given is to allow the
> backend to support multithreading introduced by an add-on library, which
> is a hopeless cause. Removing "static" from that variable declaration
> is surely a cheap enough change, but what about the next request, and
> the one after that?
Well, I have not seen the next request yet, but it seems harmless for a
useful extension to the database, namely PL/Java. I do believe this is
one of the reasons PL/J took a different approach, though.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-10-13 17:48:11 | Re: Documentation typos |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-13 17:43:08 | Re: Path to enable a module to change the stack_base_ptr |