From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Considering an upgrade... |
Date: | 2005-10-13 15:45:38 |
Message-ID: | 20051013154538.GF16317@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 06:15:36PM -0400, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> IIRC Slony wont run on anything < 7.3.6, so you would have to do an in place
> upgrade to 7.3.x as appropriate, and then you could set up slony to propogate
> to the 8.x system.
You should do that anyway, because on older releases, you really
don't want to lag the last dot-release -- there are usually some big
bugs that have been shaken out.
One thing that is really nice about using the Slony trick, by the
way, is that when you switchover to your upgraded system, you make
your old database into a replica too. That means that you have the
ability to roll back to the old release if, once you get the new
system into production use, you happen to find something you'd
overlooked.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do sir?
--attr. John Maynard Keynes
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-10-13 15:46:29 | Re: Limitations of PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Sean Davis | 2005-10-13 15:44:00 | Re: graphs in PostgreSQL |