Re: suggested warning about perl nested named subroutines

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: suggested warning about perl nested named subroutines
Date: 2005-10-12 01:55:13
Message-ID: 20051012015513.GA12454@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:58:22PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-11-10 at 18:36 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > Examples of each and how they'd break would be good.
>
> Is that needed? Seems like overkill to me.

IMHO, yes, and no, respectively. If there's an example, there's fewer
frustrated people pestering lists about it.

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-10-12 01:58:22 Re: suggested warning about perl nested named subroutines
Previous Message David Fetter 2005-10-12 01:36:44 Re: suggested warning about perl nested named subroutines