From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, J B <jbwellsiv(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker |
Date: | 2005-10-11 01:12:30 |
Message-ID: | 20051010220910.K1477@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> IIRC the last time this was brought up it was violently shot-down on
>> -hackers (and the fact that bugzilla didn't directly support PostgreSQL
>> back then had nothing to do with it).
>>
> Yep, but you never know. Someday it just may happen. The community got
> Linus to stop using his email box for patches, maybe someday we will get
> there too.
Just as a suggestion/thought ... *if* you have the resources (or someone
else wants to step up to it), why not setup the bug tracker, work with the
-www guys on having the 'bug submission' stuff feed into it, and get a
liason in place between it and -hackers? put the structure into place,
get ppl used to submitting/using it, and over time, it might be easier to
get the developers themselves to use it vs having a middle man?
There may be some developers that will go over relatively easily *once*
its in place, and others that stay resistent to it for awhile ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-10-11 01:28:29 | Re: PostgreSQL's bug tracker |
Previous Message | CSN | 2005-10-11 01:04:46 | Dumb question about serial's upper limit |