| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Subject: | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
| Date: | 2005-10-08 23:34:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20051008203403.G1477@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:22:14PM -0400, Rod Taylor wrote:
>> I could vote for:
>>
>> bool pg_query_cancel(int)
>>
>> backend_cancel or cancel_backend sounds like it should terminate the
>> entire backend like kill -TERM would do.
>
> Agreed. In fact, I thought that's what it actually did.
Oh good, I wasn't going to say anything, but that was what I thought it
did too :(
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-10-09 07:35:13 | Re: avoid pulling up subquerys that contain volatile functions? |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-08 22:51:55 | Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? |