Re: Lost patches email

On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>> I have an email to patches that never seems to appear either on the
>>> lists or the web archives. The header is:
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open
>>> transaction
>>> To: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>>> Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:24:24 -0400 (EDT)
>>> cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Jonathan Beit-Aharon <jbeita
>>> haron(at)intrusic(dot)com>
>>>
>>> The email has no attachments, and is pretty small, 75 lines. Any idea
>>> what is happening to it? This is actually the second one since
>>> yesterday that has failed for me.
>>>
>>> I have received other patches email from yesterday, so I think I am
>>> still subscribed to the patches list.
>>
>> I just checked the complete pgsql-patches queue, and found nothing ...
>> does your maillog show it as having been successfully delivered to our
>> mail server? What is the MSG ID?
>
> Sure:
>
> Oct 7 23:24:25 candle sendmail[5881]: j983OP505881: from=pgman,
> size=3148, class=0, nrcpts=5, msgid=<200510080324.j983OP505881@
> candle.pha.pa.us>, relay=pgman(at)localhost
>
> Oct 7 23:24:28 candle sendmail[5883]: j983OP505881:
> to=pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, ctladdr=pgman (113/120),
> delay=00:00:03, x delay=00:00:03, mailer=esmtp, pri=153148,
> relay=svr1.postgresql.org. [200.46.204.71], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Ok:
> queued as 3F5AED 83C7)

'k, am looking into it ... if you resend it, does it fail yet again? Do
you get nothing back indicating *why* it failed?

If you do send it again, please send me the log information as above
again, since that seems to give me more then enough information to do a
fair amount of tracing ...

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664