| From: | Emil Briggs <emil(at)baymountain(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Some spinlock patch tests |
| Date: | 2005-10-07 14:10:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200510071010.55145.emil@baymountain.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Emil Briggs <emil(at)baymountain(dot)com> writes:
> > I was testing the spinlock patches that Tom Lane posted last month
> > on a quad opteron system running Suse 9.2 for x86_64.
>
> Exactly which patch is this, and against what base version of Postgres?
> Also, what's the hardware (no, "x86_64" isn't specific enough)?
>
It's the patch referenced here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-09/msg00566.php
from the thread titled "Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches"
I applied all the pieces of the patch against v8.0.4. The hardware is a
Celestica A8440 with 4 2Ghz Opterons and 16Gbytes of RAM.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-10-07 14:17:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Shell script to extract a table from a plain text dump |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-10-07 14:04:15 | Re: prefix btree implementation |