Re: Dump all except some tables?

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Roger Hand <RHand(at)kailea(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, WireSpot <wirespot(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dump all except some tables?
Date: 2005-10-07 00:12:24
Message-ID: 20051007001224.GE30487@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 04:31:14PM -0700, Roger Hand wrote:
> > From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Jim C. Nasby
> > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 3:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Dump all except some tables?
> >
> > ... I find myself wondering if it would be good to allow for
> > specifying a set of rules for what to dump in a file, probably
> > something like a set of regexes with a way to specify if it's an
> > include or exclude rule. Seems like it would be a heck of a lot
> > simpler to do that for complex cases than deal with a pile of
> > spaghetti on the command-line
>
> It may be useful to cut down on command line clutter if one could
> specify a file holding a list of table names to include/exclude.

Here's my thoughts on a summary:

[-t [table | glob]]... # 0 or more -t options
[-T [table | glob]]... # 0 or more -T options
[--include-tables-from-file f]
[--exclude-tables-from-file f]

where globs get expanded just the way they are in psql, and the
exclude is evaluated after the include to remove any tables where they
might conflict. I don't think regex matching is needed or good.

Does this make sense?

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2005-10-07 00:34:06 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
Previous Message CSN 2005-10-07 00:02:25 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?