Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Jeffrey Melloy <jmelloy(at)visualdistortion(dot)org>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Aly S(dot)P Dharshi" <aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Gotchas
Date: 2005-10-06 23:42:05
Message-ID: 20051006234205.GA73899@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 05:47:36PM -0500, Jeffrey Melloy wrote:
> The only thing I could see actually being an issue is the random() one
> and add missing from. The rest are trivial. The random() thing is
> interesting, esoteric, and probably has never been a problem in a real
> situation. (Or has exactly once, when he wrote that gotcha)

The random() issue has a workaround that the gotchas page doesn't
mention:

SELECT id, is_true
FROM (SELECT id, RANDOM() < 0.5 AS is_true FROM some_table OFFSET 0) AS t_tmp
WHERE is_true;

Tom Lane brought up the OFFSET 0 trick a couple of days ago in the
"Avoiding evaluating functions twice" thread:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-10/msg00107.php

--
Michael Fuhr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message CSN 2005-10-07 00:02:25 Re: PostgreSQL 8.1 vs. MySQL 5.0?
Previous Message Roger Hand 2005-10-06 23:31:14 Re: Dump all except some tables?