From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
Date: | 2005-10-07 01:57:33 |
Message-ID: | 20051006225655.A1477@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc wrote:
> I don't get a vote - but I do want to suggest, as a user, that I get
> generally annoyed with the presence of interfaces with names that
> were chosen for historical reasons, but are maintained only for
> compatibility, and either never did, or no longer apply.
>
> I'd rather you left it fixed. Returning it to the old name, for the
> sake of process, and no other good reason, doesn't appeal to me. It is
> a lesson learned. We move on. Enforce the process next time. Self
> inflicted punishment is somewhat masochistic. :-)
If we don't enforce the process this time, why would we enforce it next
time?
You either always enforce it, or never ... you don't pick and choose
though ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-10-07 01:59:33 | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2005-10-07 01:53:35 | Re: Vote needed: revert beta2 changes or not? |