| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: current_user versus current_role |
| Date: | 2005-10-05 13:32:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20051005133251.GJ5239@surnet.cl |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 03:17:25PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hi,
> I used info from current_user for log. about some operations (who, when,
> ..). What I can see, current_user is equal current_role function. I had
> problem with it, because user (if is member of any group role) can change
> his identity. example: peter is member of role users. But peter can do set
> role to users. From this moment I lost possibility of get identity if user,
> because current_user returns users and not peter. I can check it (if some
> user changed identity) ~ by exampl. test if role has login privilegia, and
> if not I can stop any operations.
I believe you can use session_user for this.
--
Alvaro Herrera Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org
"Amanece. (Ignacio Reyes)
El Cerro San Cristóbal me mira, cínicamente, con ojos de virgen"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2005-10-05 14:32:40 | Re: Slony RPM issue |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-10-05 13:17:25 | current_user versus current_role |