| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? |
| Date: | 2005-10-03 21:59:30 |
| Message-ID: | 200510031459.30802.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Michael,
> >Nope, LOTS of testing, at OSDL, GreenPlum and Sun. For comparison, A
> >Big-Name Proprietary Database doesn't get much more than that either.
>
> You seem to be talking about database IO, which isn't what you said.
Right, well, it was what I meant. I failed to specify, that's all.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-10-03 22:03:11 | Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? |
| Previous Message | Michael Stone | 2005-10-03 21:53:32 | Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-10-03 22:03:11 | Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? |
| Previous Message | Michael Stone | 2005-10-03 21:53:32 | Re: [HACKERS] A Better External Sort? |