From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Release, 3rd draft |
Date: | 2005-10-03 19:45:05 |
Message-ID: | 200510031245.05739.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Jim,
> If we're going to go with 2pc, it should be 2PC IMO. But I think it
> would be better to spell it out (two-phase ocmmit).
Oh, right, missed that.
> New Advanced Features, para 2:
> s#INOUT#IN/OUT#
Really? I thought the technical term for the 3 types of params were IN,
OUT, and INOUT.
> The table partitioning section is a bit misleading in that it doesn't
> actually help with large tables, it just makes partitioning a bit more
> effective.
Suggested replacement language?
> On the BSD/GPL horse, what about...
>
> PostgreSQL is distributed under a BSD license, which unlike GPL licensed
> software, allows use and distribution without fees for both commercial
> and non-commercial applications.
I am *NOT* picking a fight with the FSF. Also, many people (myself
included) do not agree with MySQL's draconian interpretation of the GPL.
This would get us headlines, all right, but the wrong kind.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-10-03 19:47:14 | Re: Release, 3rd draft |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-10-03 19:44:13 | Re: Release, 3rd draft |