Re: Proposal: leave a hint when switching logging away from stderr

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: leave a hint when switching logging away from stderr
Date: 2013-08-09 16:36:43
Message-ID: 20051.1376066203@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> Does this rise to the level of a usability bug that ought to be
>> back-patched? As I said, we've seen this type of thinko multiple
>> times before.

> For this, I'd say to not back-patch it; we seem to have had enough fun
> with changing error messaging in back branches already lately (eg:
> the recent autovacuum changes..).

Well, since these would be new messages, they'd just not get translated
(until the translators got around to them). Seems like the worst case
scenario is that someone who didn't understand the English version would
remain as clueless as before, which isn't much of a downside.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-08-09 16:44:41 Re: pg_dump and schema names
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-08-09 16:32:56 Re: question about HTTP API