| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Found small issue with OUT params |
| Date: | 2005-09-30 23:41:58 |
| Message-ID: | 20050930234158.GS40138@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:53:22AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >So you might notice little performance hit bringing back a million rows,
> >and most of these type of single OUT params functions only return one
> >row/value anyway.
> >There would be zero perceivable difference in performance regardless of
> >the extra overhead for a single value/row.
>
> Sounds like we need a test case... up for it?
If there is a performance difference my vote is that we bite the bullet
for 8.1 and accept the performance hit rather than settle for
sub-optimal behavior. Much easier to fix the performance penalty down
the road than to fix the behavior.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-09-30 23:48:53 | Re: Query in SQL statement |
| Previous Message | Ron Peacetree | 2005-09-30 23:40:09 | Re: [PERFORM] A Better External Sort? |