Re: Time to start the PR machine

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time to start the PR machine
Date: 2005-09-30 17:31:48
Message-ID: 200509301731.j8UHVmT25317@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


I think converted is the wrong word. Maybe "stored".

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> ----
> Bitmap Scan: some indexes will be automatically converted to
> bitmaps in memory, giving up to 20x faster index performance on
> complex queries against against very large tables, such as those
> found in data marts. Bitmap Scan also greatly reduces the need
> for multi-column indexes.
>
> Bitmap Scan: indexes will be automatically converted when appropriate...
>
> when needed
>
> ----
>
> ----
> Shared Row Locking: PostgreSQL's "better than row-level
> locking" has been improved further through the addition of
> shared row locks for foreign keys. Shared locks will improve
> insert and update performance on some OLTP applications
> ^^^^
>
> The word "some" sounds like it is a minority of OLTP applications.
> In general any moderately used OLTP app will benifit from this yes?
>
> many, most, or just say performance on OLTP applications.
>
> ---
>
>
>
> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Javier, Josh, Mitch, etc.:
> >
> >> How about instead looking at this issue by trying to define a short
> >> statement about postgres which should be included in every release,
> >
> >
> > You know, all of your feedback would be *much* more useful if you
> > actually read the release I have up, currently. I'll repeat, because
> > nobody on *this* thread has once referred to this fact:
> >
> > The "ABOUT POSTGRESQL" statement contains a mention of the BSD license
> > and its business-friendliness.
> >
> > Now, all of you, please read the release and make comments on what's
> > actually there, thanks.
> >
> > http://pgfoundry.org/docman/view.php/1000047/85/release.txt
> >
> > The question is not whether we need to mention our license. That's
> > already there. It's whether it needs more emphasis than it's already
> > getting, like the phrase "released under the flexible BSD license" in
> > the first paragraph.
> >
> > --Josh
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
> --
> Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
> Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
> Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-09-30 17:31:56 Re: Time to start the PR machine
Previous Message Javier Soltero 2005-09-30 17:23:57 Re: Time to start the PR machine