Re: XA

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Subject: Re: XA
Date: 2005-09-30 03:09:31
Message-ID: 200509292009.32098.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Chris,

> There was an JDBC-based *attempt* at an XA handler; it wasn't fully
> functional, which essentially means it wasn't really XA.
>
> When the 2PC discussion was going on, it definitely came up in the
> discussion that this was a prerequisite to doing XA properly.  It
> might not be forcibly necessary in the strictest sense, but 2PC is
> certainly one of the normal means for synchronizing distributed
> transactions...

But ... now that we have 2PC, XA could be implemented through pg-jdbc if
someone wanted to, yes?

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

  • XA at 2005-09-28 03:10:53 from Chris Browne

Responses

  • Re: XA at 2005-09-30 05:31:22 from Kris Jurka

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2005-09-30 05:31:22 Re: XA
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-09-30 03:07:17 Re: Time to start the PR machine