From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |
Date: | 2005-09-29 02:41:12 |
Message-ID: | 200509290241.j8T2fCg14650@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Also, why is the nextval ::text casting output by pg_dump anyway?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I am thinking we should hard-code something in the backend so if the
> > function oid is nextval/currval/setval, we strip off any text casting
> > internally.
>
> NO. No bloody way ... that is far dirtier than any other proposal
> that's been made in this thread. I don't even want to think about
> what strange corner-case semantics that might create.
>
> >> So on the whole I like leaving nextval() as-is and introducing a
> >> separate function next_value(regclass).
>
> > I disagree. nextval() is too embedded in people's thinking to make them
> > change
>
> Why? And what's your evidence for this? You could equally well argue
> that the fact that nextval takes a text argument is too embedded to
> change.
>
> > when we have the ability to have it do the _right_ _thing_,
>
> We have no ability to make it do what you think is the right thing,
> at least not without introducing kluges that are certain to come back
> to haunt us.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2005-09-29 02:48:21 | Re: Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-09-29 02:37:45 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2005-09-29 02:48:21 | Re: Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-09-29 02:37:45 | Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for sequence-renaming problems |