From: | evgeny gridasov <eugrid(at)fpm(dot)kubsu(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RAID Stripe size |
Date: | 2005-09-20 16:02:10 |
Message-ID: | 20050920200210.27ad75cf.eugrid@fpm.kubsu.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
We have a production server(8.0.2) running 24x7, 300k+ transactions per day.
Linux 2.6.11 / JFS file system.
No problems. It works faster than ext3.
> Alex Turner wrote:
>
> > I would also recommend looking at file system. For us JFS worked signifcantly
> > faster than resier for large read loads and large write loads, so we chose JFS
> > over ext3 and reiser.
>
> has jfs been reliable for you? there seems to be a lot of conjecture about instability,
> but i find jfs a potentially attractive alternative for a number of reasons.
>
> richard
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
--
Evgeny Gridasov
Software Developer
I-Free, Russia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | evgeny gridasov | 2005-09-20 18:12:55 | Planner statistics vs. count(*) |
Previous Message | Alex Turner | 2005-09-20 15:35:58 | Re: Need for speed 2 |