Re: Duplicate Values or Not?!

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Mike Nolan <nolan(at)gw(dot)tssi(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)MIT(dot)EDU>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, John Seberg <johnseberg(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Duplicate Values or Not?!
Date: 2005-09-17 18:14:08
Message-ID: 20050917181402.GB11697@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 12:45:17PM -0500, Mike Nolan wrote:
> > I don't know if it's guarenteed by spec, but it certainly seems silly
> > for strings to compare equal when they're not. Just because a locale
> > sorts ignoring case doesn't mean that "sun" and "Sun" are the same. The
> > only real sensible rule is that strcoll should return 0 only if strcmp
> > would also return zero...
>
> I disagree. Someone who wants true case independence (for whatever reason)
> needs all aspects of uniqueness such as selects, indexes and groups
> treating data the same way.
>
> This needs to be something the person who creates the instance or the
> database can control.

Such people need to be looking at citext [1]. My point is that the
*locale* should not be case-insensetive that way. Consider that if the
locale treats "sun" and "Sun" identically, then I can't have
case-sensetivity if I want it. If they are treated differently, I can
build case-insensetivity on top of it.

[1] http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/citext/projdisplay.php
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2005-09-17 19:49:24 Re: Duplicate Values or Not?!
Previous Message Mike Nolan 2005-09-17 17:45:17 Re: Duplicate Values or Not?!