From: | Bill Moseley <moseley(at)hank(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Setting WHERE on a VIEW with aggregate function. |
Date: | 2005-09-16 18:30:27 |
Message-ID: | 20050916183027.GA1081@hank.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have a view to generate a list of instructors and a count of their
future classes.
"instructors" is a link table between "class" and "person".
CREATE VIEW future_instructor_counts
AS
SELECT person.id AS person_id,
first_name,
last_name,
count(instructors.class) AS class_count
FROM class, instructors, person
WHERE class.id = instructors.class AND
person.id = instructors.person
AND class_time > now()
GROUP BY person_id, first_name, last_name;
I have two very basic SQL questions:
1) With an aggregate function in the query, is there any way to remove
the "AND class_time > now()" so that timestamp can be passed in the
select? That is, I'd like to be able to do this?
select * from instructor_counts where class_time > now();
But class_time is not part of the VIEW so that's not valid. And if it
was included then I don't have an aggregate function any more - no
more grouping.
2) I think I'm missing something obvious. I know that I need to
specify all my non-aggregate columns in the "GROUP BY", but I don't
under stand why. Really, the results are just grouped only by
person.id so why the need to specify the other columns.
And if you don't specify all the columns then Postgresql reports:
ERROR: column "person.id" must appear in the GROUP BY
clause or be used in an aggregate function
Is there a reason Postgresql doesn't just add the column
automatically? It does in other cases (like a missing table in a
join).
Thanks
--
Bill Moseley
moseley(at)hank(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2005-09-16 18:35:49 | Re: Create a pg table from CSV with header rows |
Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-09-16 18:15:41 | Re: Neither column can be NULL if the column is part of the combination of primary key columns? |