Re: 8.1 system info / admin functions

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.1 system info / admin functions
Date: 2005-09-14 13:39:43
Message-ID: 20050914133943.GQ6026@ns.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> > While we're on the subject, the units used by pg_size_pretty() are
> > incorrect, at least according to the IEC: for example, "MB" is
> > strictly-speaking one million bytes, not 1024^2 bytes. 1024^2 bytes is 1
> > MiB (similarly for KiB, GiB, and TiB). I'll take a look at fixing this
> > as well, barring any objections.
>
> [ itch... ] The IEC may think they get to define what's correct, but
> I don't think that squares with common usage. The only people who
> think MB is measured in decimal are disk-manufacturer marketroids.

That isn't entirely accurate, unfortunately. Telecom also generally
uses decimal. I'm as unhappy with the current situation as anyone but
it's not just disk makers & marketing folks, even amoung the computing
industry.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-09-14 13:48:19 Re: Bug with cursor declaration in plpgsql? (Repost)
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2005-09-14 12:04:43 Re: VACUUM VERBOSE 8.1dev