From: | "Min Xu (Hsu)" <xu(at)cs(dot)wisc(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches |
Date: | 2005-09-14 03:22:44 |
Message-ID: | 20050914032243.GM5161@cs.wisc.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 Tom Lane wrote :
> "Min Xu (Hsu)" <xu(at)cs(dot)wisc(dot)edu> writes:
> > ... As you said, however, experimental results
> > shows fetching read-only lines didn't help, which led me wonder whether the
> > second scenario your described was really happening.
>
> I don't know --- we haven't tried it. I do intend to work up some
> patches for these ideas, and then we can test them.
I see. I look forward to it.
> Or, if you happen to be wide awake at the moment, feel free to take a
> shot at it ... I'm out of steam and won't get to it before tomorrow...
I am newbie here. Please don't let my comments discourage you from
doing anything. I enjoyed very much following your discussion and analysis
on this problem.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-14 03:24:17 | Re: 8.1 system info / admin functions |
Previous Message | Pryscila B Guttoski | 2005-09-14 03:20:19 | Re: About method of PostgreSQL's Optimizer |