Re: EMS PostgreSQL Manager vs. TheKompany DataArchitect

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Wolfgang Keller <wolfgang(dot)keller(dot)nospam(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: EMS PostgreSQL Manager vs. TheKompany DataArchitect
Date: 2005-09-08 15:53:16
Message-ID: 20050908155316.GA13949@surnet.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 07:52:57AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Wolfgang Keller wrote:
>
> >Hello,
> >
> >>Both have trials - try it ;-)
> >
> >That's what I've done, as I mentioned. But sometimes others know/see
> >things that I don't see/know, at least not within a restricted trial
> >period.
>
> It seems to me that EMS PostgreSQL Manager is more actively developed
> which probably is a good thing.

Note that theKompany departed from the developers of the Rekall product,
which they now distribute separately. See http://www.totalrekall.co.uk/
and in particular

http://www.totalrekall.co.uk/modules.php?name=FAQ&myfaq=yes&id_cat=6&categories=Rekall+%3A+TheKompany

So if you are trying a theKompany product, know that it may be obsolete
and no longer in development.

--
Alvaro Herrera -- Valdivia, Chile Architect, www.EnterpriseDB.com
"Aprender sin pensar es inútil; pensar sin aprender, peligroso" (Confucio)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex 2005-09-08 16:08:14 Formatting TimeStamp
Previous Message Bohdan Linda 2005-09-08 15:35:40 Re: Partial commit within the trasaction