From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Wiki? |
Date: | 2005-09-07 18:20:23 |
Message-ID: | 200509072020.24392.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Why oh why yet another content infrastructure? Can't we get techdocs
> fixed/updated/removed something... before we put resources into yet
> more infrastructure?
What imagine doing with a Wiki has nothing to do with what techdocs
does. In particular, I occasionally would like to use a Wiki as a
notepad for tracking development issues. Just to pick a random
example, this could be used to gather notes on SQL feature conformance.
It could also be used for the regular must-fix-before-release list.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-09-08 06:07:12 | New Survey: where did you get your PostgreSQL? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-09-07 16:36:53 | Re: Wiki? |