From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples |
Date: | 2005-09-03 14:06:16 |
Message-ID: | 20050903140616.GA7016@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:59:31AM +0200, Manfred Koizar wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 20:41:48 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Momjian
> <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Once I had a patch based on 7.4 that stored cmin and cmax in
> >> backend-local memory.
>
> >Interesting idea, but how would you record the cmin/xmin values without
> >requiring unlimited memory?
>
> That's exactly the reason for not sending it to -patches. Without
> spilling to disk this is just not ready for real life. The problem is
> that -- unlike other data structures that build up during a
> transaction, e.g. trigger queues -- cmin/cmax lookup requires random
> access, so we'd need some form of tree or hash. Unfornunately I never
> got beyond brainstorming :-(
>
> BTW, is there anything else that'd need spilling to disk during long
> transactions?
Yes, the queue of pending deferred triggers.
--
Alvaro Herrera -- Valdivia, Chile Architect, www.EnterpriseDB.com
"El hombre nunca sabe de lo que es capaz hasta que lo intenta" (C. Dickens)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-09-03 14:09:08 | Re: Adding a new node to the executor |
Previous Message | Varun Kacholia | 2005-09-03 09:43:20 | Adding a new node to the executor |