| From: | Terry Lee Tucker <terry(at)esc1(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Question regarding FOUND |
| Date: | 2005-09-02 13:29:36 |
| Message-ID: | 200509020929.36487.terry@esc1.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I haven't tried it. It's a complicated trigger function with updates to other
tables that are NOT dynamic in nature. If the EXECUTE statement doesn't set
the FOUND variable, then I will be reading the result from a previous
operation. I thought maybe somebody would know this already.
On Friday 02 September 2005 09:14 am, Michael Fuhr saith:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:51:41AM -0400, Terry Lee Tucker wrote:
> > Will the FOUND variable be set, when using EXECUTE, as it would be with a
> > normal UPDATE statement?
>
> What happened when you tried it?
>
> --
> Michael Fuhr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mavinakuli, Prasanna (STSD) | 2005-09-02 13:52:53 | Not able to insert the large data to HP-UX IA machines |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-09-02 13:14:47 | Re: Question regarding FOUND |