From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | getting an index to work with partial indices ... |
Date: | 2005-08-29 19:56:15 |
Message-ID: | 20050829165335.X1044@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Try as I might, I can't seem to get it to work ... table has >9million
rows in it, I've created an index "using btree ( priority ) where priority
< 0;", where the table distribution looks like:
priority | count
----------+---------
-2 | 138435
-1 | 943250
1 | 3416
9 | 1134171
| 7276960
(5 rows)
And it still won't use the index:
# explain update table set priority = -3 where priority = -1;
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on table (cost=0.00..400735.90 rows=993939 width=278)
Filter: (priority = -1)
(2 rows)
But, ti will if I try 'priority = -2' ... what is teh threshhold for using
the index? obviously 10% of the records is too high ...
thanks ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas F. O'Connell | 2005-08-29 20:15:21 | Re: Need indexes on empty tables for good performance ? |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-08-29 18:41:46 | Re: Limit + group + join |