From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TODO list comments |
Date: | 2005-08-26 22:15:20 |
Message-ID: | 20050826221520.GL11282@pervasive.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 03:44:18PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > I *think* this is reffering to how pg_dump makes some assumptions about
> > what things are system objects.
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-08/msg00203.php
> > doesn't help a heck of a lot...
> >
> > Can we add an interface to the TODO list that contains search links back
> > to the mailing lists?
>
> Yes, that would be nice, though some times the threads are pretty long
> and I try to digest the agreed-upon solution. Where would we put the
> URLs? In the TODO file?
Yeah, the digestification is good, and I hope it continues. But it's
also good to be able to refer back to the original thread in it's
entirety. My thought was to make the TODO item itself a link to the
search (or ideally the thread itself). The advantage of just linking to
the search is that would allow a clever CGI to just parse through the
TODO and linkify the TODO items.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-26 22:20:47 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-26 21:20:50 | Re: Any MIPS assembly experts in the house? |