| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Spikewatch testing |
| Date: | 2005-08-26 20:41:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20050826204119.GJ11282@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Spikewatch is testing a number of different open-source components,
including ours. If you click on a green datapoint, you can see what our
actual code-coverage was for that test (presumably they're running the
regression tests). Unfortunately, the banner ad I saw for them showed
MySQL (along with a bunch of other things), but not PostgreSQL.
Is it worth trying to promote this as a way to promote PostgreSQL? Also,
is it worth trying to improve our test coverage?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-08-26 20:49:34 | Re: Spikewatch testing |
| Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2005-08-26 19:26:57 | Re: Certification and SRA |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-08-26 20:49:34 | Re: Spikewatch testing |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-26 20:20:49 | Re: Any MIPS assembly experts in the house? |