| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Date: | 2005-08-25 23:56:08 |
| Message-ID: | 200508251656.08356.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro,
> We have gone a long way now, even though it was only a year ago. My
> question for everyone on this list is: What are the "few remaining big
> features" that you see missing for PostgreSQL?
-- on-disk bitmaps and composite indexes (due out for Bizgres in about a
month)
-- More table partitioning stuff
-- materialized view support
-- streams (per TelegraphCQ)
-- database ASSERTIONS
-- clustering (SlonyII)
-- multi-threaded/process query execution (i.e. one query, multiple
processors)
-- more robust message queing
-- SQL99 TYPES (aka Packages)
-- Recursive Joins
-- MERGE
-- interactive/automated database performance tuning
-- index-only access
-- automated creation of updatable views
> Has PostgreSQL started slowing down in getting new features, and
> concentrating mostly on performance issues?
Hmmm, I don't think so. We will eventually, but there's still plenty of
features left.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-08-26 00:02:16 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-08-25 23:50:13 | Re: Stuff running slooow |