| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Emi Lu <emilu(at)cs(dot)concordia(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: About column type to "varchar(1)" or "char(1)" |
| Date: | 2005-08-24 22:28:56 |
| Message-ID: | 20050824222831.GA25775@svana.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 03:06:18PM -0400, Emi Lu wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> A question about varchar(1) and char(1).
<snip>
> As a result, setup 'col1' to either "varchar(1)" or "char(1)" does not
> matter at all?
As far as storage goes, nope. Think about it, depending on your
encoding, 1 character might be 4 bytes.
char() adds padding but varchar() doesn't. That's the difference
really...
Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | William Yu | 2005-08-24 23:22:39 | Re: Postgresql replication |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2005-08-24 22:19:17 | Re: Postgresql replication |