From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruno Almeida do Lago <teolupus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: OCFS released as GPL |
Date: | 2005-08-23 18:30:21 |
Message-ID: | 20050823183021.GC6139@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 08:55:00AM -0300, Bruno Almeida do Lago wrote:
> I haven't found any message on archives talking about this, so I'm posting
> it.
>
> The OCFS (Oracle Cluster File System) is now GPL - see more on
> http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/
>
> What do you think?
The file system is not the problem -- it's shared memory that's an issue
for Postgres.
There is a "distributed lock manager" (by Redhat I think) that could be
the base for implementing something vaguely cluster-y, but there are lots
of roadblocks to it. I assume Slony-II will be here way earlier, making
it all moot.
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>)
"Right now the sectors on the hard disk run clockwise, but I heard a rumor that
you can squeeze 0.2% more throughput by running them counterclockwise.
It's worth the effort. Recommended." (Gerry Pourwelle)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-23 19:08:18 | Re: ctid access is slow |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-08-23 18:27:39 | Re: ctid access is slow |