From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Lance Obermeyer <LObermey(at)pervasive(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca> |
Subject: | Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2005-08-19 20:53:22 |
Message-ID: | 200508192053.j7JKrMG04343@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Why not just put the mark into the public domain? I think it might
> >> already be there.
> >
> > Well that was kind of my point about not being enforceable. The PostgreSQL
> > trademark would be almost impossible to enforce as it never
> > has been enforced.
>
> Until recently, the Linux trademark wasn't being enforced either, to the
> best of my knowledge ... obviously it doesn't take much to change that, if
> this initiative that is being discussed is making headway ...
Well, the Linux Trademark Institute has been around for a long time, and
I have seen places where they state that the Linux trademark is owned by
Linus.
I think in this case they are doing much more damage to Linux by
enforcing the trademark than the possible damage caused by negative use
of the trademark.
I am worried about companies being scared to promote PostgreSQL because
of trademark concerns.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-08-19 20:55:18 | Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-08-19 20:45:45 | Re: Linux trademark and PostgreSQL |