Re: [GENERAL] Cascades Failing

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Cascades Failing
Date: 2005-08-17 21:52:47
Message-ID: 20050817145050.T93796@megazone.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Stephan Szabo wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I think this would take some generalization of afterTriggerInvokeEvents,
> > which now might or might not find the target rel in the EState it's
> > passed, but otherwise it doesn't seem too invasive. Thoughts?
>
> That doesn't seem too bad really, looking at afterTriggerInvokeEvents it
> doesn't look like it'd be that much work to change it to handle that case.
> I can put a patch together to see what it looks like.

I did some work on this, and I'm getting a couple of other failures from
other parts of the foreign key regression test (specifically an error
that is no longer erroring in a multi-column on update set default). I'm
going to need to look more closely to see if I can figure out why.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Edmund 2005-08-17 21:54:40 Re: Generating random values.
Previous Message Matt Miller 2005-08-17 21:35:04 Re: Schema design question

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2005-08-17 21:54:31 Re: pl/Ruby, deprecating plPython and Core
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-17 21:42:32 Re: pthread stack on FreeBSD WAS: HEAD doesn't cope with libraries