Re: Missing CONCURRENT VACUUM (Was: Release notes for 8.1)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Missing CONCURRENT VACUUM (Was: Release notes for 8.1)
Date: 2005-08-17 00:09:17
Message-ID: 200508170009.j7H09Hq08967@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> writes:
> > Once more:
> > I would like to get at least some answer, why my patch for enabling
> > concurrent VACUUM was left out from 8.1.
>
> You did not respond to this:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-08/msg00238.php

Yep, that's why I put it in the 8.2 queue.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-08-17 00:14:05 More handles for BGWriter?
Previous Message markw 2005-08-16 23:57:58 Re: data on devel code perf dip